W12 blog topic: Discuss Reagle’s chapter 6 - HanBin Bae



Summury
The origin of the collaboration culture in Wikipedia depends on how much you depend on the role and status of the leader. Wikipedia has many other open communities and is not forceful. Many people participate without any compensation. The most influential people are Wales and Saint. Wales sees his leadership as central due to his vision of establishment, early activities, contributions to cooperative norms, and other ' relations with the powerful '. It's a great way to understand Wikipedia.
Understanding of communities and cooperative cultures is the key. Despite its good working culture and openness, Wikipedia has been shaped by its authoritative leadership.


Interesting Point

Wikipedia. Accordingly, communities and rules were managed and developed. I felt Jimmy was not an ordinary person watching this. I think it's great how you think of it.Jimmy was initially one of his broad vision and supervision and led to his preferred management style. Show how these parallel content is understood in authoritative form. It is one of the most influential people in Wikipedia and has inspired us to imagine the process of forming Wikipedia today.


Discussion

Wikipedia was driven in many positive ways, but authority eventually took the lead. Authority is formed by a leader. Not only Wikipedia but also the world will be influenced by who is the leader who can handle this authority.How will Wikipedia change if it was formed by an unauthorized leader? Was it possible to remain as it is now? If so, which leader was a good leader and which leader was not? I think Wikipedia may not have been maintained as it is. And great
A leader thinks he is honest, confident and confident without using his rights. I want to hear what you think.


Comments

  1. UnknownMay 25, 2018 at 10:29 AM

    Your question about which leader is a good leader is very interesting. It is also a good question to ask what will happen if a non-authoritative leader takes power. According to Weber, authority refers to power with legitimacy. Sometimes the exercise of power is arbitrary, but the benevolent dictator which the author says is different from ruthless dictatorship. That leader makes judgments that reflect the consensus and requirements of the users. At first I was skeptical about such leadership, but as I read the article, I felt that authority was sometimes needed. Dictatorship is dangerous, but the exercise of authority through democratic processes contributes to the efficiency of Wikipedia. Unauthorized readers may not find the right way in the voices of so many users.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownMay 26, 2018 at 2:16 AM

    Thinking of your question, I think about the role of the leader of Wikipedia once more.
    Although it is not specified as a leader, there must have been and will be a leader in reaching consensus. But the question is who will be. A good person who is honest, confident and unauthorized as you say will maintain neutrality and reach consensus as Wales has pursued. In other words, if the situation to solve a problem comes up anyway, I think that a leader who can gather more opinions without stubbornness of oneself and get better results is needed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownMay 26, 2018 at 5:44 AM

    I read your article well.
    I think that a leader in Wikipedia is not necessary. The existence of a power leader in Wikipedia, the leader of collaboration and creativity, is contradictory. The existence of a leader in a space created by the opinions and efforts of everyone is a change in purpose and outcome. Rather than a community called Wikipedia, it is understandable to think of a good leader elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more