W11 Reagle’s fifth chapter : consensus

This article tackles the issue of the difficulty to obtain consensus when reaching the point of decision making.
We know that Wikipedia leaves many freedom to its users including the naming, editing and creation of the pages. However some conflict can arise, some of the solution are the following disambigation links, the talk page, and nominating the article to deletion/ renaming.
A discussion engage, a consensus is reached when the majority agree on it. When the case is difficult and there is no obvious majority someone from the arbitration committee is appointed to assist and ultimately lead the discussion to a favorable ending.
However determining when a consensus is reached is quite hard, that’s why wikipedia’s decision are usually not made by polling (which depends on who shows up on what day) but based on a system of good reason.

Consensus is a hard word to define, it is really interesting in the conclusion, consensus is defined as « one of the three states that can be reached at the end of a discussion after all parties have become thoroughly fed up with it » which i think summarize quite Well the notion.


As seen in this article consensus is a pillar of wikipedia’s functionning, enabling the wikipedia users to work in autonomy as long as this principle is respected. But it is a process that can be infinite, if someone is not satisfied with no result he can nominate the article again. Or what if the consensus doesn’t upgrade the article but downgrade it, can it be nominated again ? How to evaluate the result of these decisions ? 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more

W14. What did I learn in this course?. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

W14. What did I learn in this course? Information sociology 2015048986 천병헌 1. Summary   I took classes in "collective intelligence" and "everyday life sociology". In this process, I had many difficulties. It was very difficult to find information when using Wikipedia. I did not know how to approach. But I learned sandbox while listening to class. Also, it became understandable by learning connection links and sending messages.  Various techniques have helped me edit my Wikipedia. When I edit Wikipedia's information every week, I try to understand Korean culture and culture of other countries. And I tried to find fact-oriented articles and papers. During this process, I was exchanging discussions with many people. I gave feedback on my article and I revised it again. So, I am now able to improve the article writing ability of Wikipedia. Sometimes my friends refer to Wikipedia. Each time my friends see my article and ask. "Did you really make i...
Read more