W11. Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

1. Summary

  This chapter discusses the difficulties of consensus decision making and decision making at Wikipedia. In Wikipedia, consensus is an appropriate way to make decisions in the community. This approach provides a solution to the controversy that wiki administrators or debaters can not resolve. Consensus does not mean unanimity. In order to reach agreement, it is important to respect the opinions of the members. In order to reach an appropriate consensus, we must listen to the opinions of various people. Whether it is the opposite or the pros, it should have an open mind.

2. Interesting point

  Various discussions are taking place in various communities as well as in Wikipedia. People have their own opinions. And some people debate with various sources to support their opinions. There may be some disputes in this process. In particular, the best way to resolve conflicts online is to resolve them democratically. The methods include voting, consensus, and consideration. But the best way I think is consensus. It is neither unanimous nor majority. In the process of resolving the dispute, we are ready to accept people's rational opinions. Furthermore, it is the act of finding the best in the process.

3. Discussion point

  We have a lot of cooperation in Wikipedia. Several conflicts can arise in this collaboration. Generally, people respond emotionally when a dispute arises. It also avoids disputes or engages directly with people. But this is not a democratic way, and it can reduce the quality of the space like Wikipedia. How do you resolve conflicts from a few people when you edit information?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more

W14. What did I learn in this course?. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

W14. What did I learn in this course? Information sociology 2015048986 천병헌 1. Summary   I took classes in "collective intelligence" and "everyday life sociology". In this process, I had many difficulties. It was very difficult to find information when using Wikipedia. I did not know how to approach. But I learned sandbox while listening to class. Also, it became understandable by learning connection links and sending messages.  Various techniques have helped me edit my Wikipedia. When I edit Wikipedia's information every week, I try to understand Korean culture and culture of other countries. And I tried to find fact-oriented articles and papers. During this process, I was exchanging discussions with many people. I gave feedback on my article and I revised it again. So, I am now able to improve the article writing ability of Wikipedia. Sometimes my friends refer to Wikipedia. Each time my friends see my article and ask. "Did you really make i...
Read more