W11. Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

1. Summary

  This chapter discusses the difficulties of consensus decision making and decision making at Wikipedia. In Wikipedia, consensus is an appropriate way to make decisions in the community. This approach provides a solution to the controversy that wiki administrators or debaters can not resolve. Consensus does not mean unanimity. In order to reach agreement, it is important to respect the opinions of the members. In order to reach an appropriate consensus, we must listen to the opinions of various people. Whether it is the opposite or the pros, it should have an open mind.

2. Interesting point

  Various discussions are taking place in various communities as well as in Wikipedia. People have their own opinions. And some people debate with various sources to support their opinions. There may be some disputes in this process. In particular, the best way to resolve conflicts online is to resolve them democratically. The methods include voting, consensus, and consideration. But the best way I think is consensus. It is neither unanimous nor majority. In the process of resolving the dispute, we are ready to accept people's rational opinions. Furthermore, it is the act of finding the best in the process.

3. Discussion point

  We have a lot of cooperation in Wikipedia. Several conflicts can arise in this collaboration. Generally, people respond emotionally when a dispute arises. It also avoids disputes or engages directly with people. But this is not a democratic way, and it can reduce the quality of the space like Wikipedia. How do you resolve conflicts from a few people when you edit information?


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Yong il. Seon

1. Summary It is easy to understand the contents. It is very difficult to understand when you read articles or papers for information. This is caused by the type of work required by the article or thesis. So, naturally, it is difficult to write the explanation. Wikipedia, on the other hand, is very unformal. You can insert pictures or modify the composition as required.   2. Interesting Point The most interesting part is the 'accessibility'. Wikipedia page provides a great deal of information simultaneously. For instance, suppose a user retrieves a word. Users may encounter new concepts they do not know while reading the description of the word. However, Wikipedia does offer separate links to the new concept. Therefore, users can get a lot of information without having to make extra efforts. Access to information is Wikipedia's strong point.   3. Discussion Point All users are editors and informers. This creates copyright problems. Wikipedia tries to ...
Read more

W12. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 6

1. Summary Ideals and reality always conflict. We always dream of a world like utopia, but the real world never becomes utopia. The reason is that there are a lot of variables (personality, culture, social characteristics) that exist in reality. The same is true of a small world called Wikipedia. While Wikipedia has a clear, open, civilized, and equitable encyclopedia as its ideal, this value necessarily results in a dispute when many people are involved. What is needed for this is the 'benevolent dictator'. No matter how open the community, you need someone to control the minimum dispute. They usually speak softly to people, relax the mood through humor, and in the worst case lock out articles or disputes. Since Wikipedia was founded, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales are the most influential people. In a nutshell, Sanger was a strong executive, and Wales was a more mild executive. Sanger left Wikipedia, but in fact it does not make sense to say that either of them is better. ...
Read more

W4. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 1-2. - Seron Kim

This article explains the process and motto of Wikipedia. Unlike previous encyclopedias, Wikipedia aims to collect all human knowledge and make it freely editable and redistributable to everyone. In fact, anyone who can access Wikipedia through the Internet can easily edit and get information. Wikipedia is said to be developed through accumulation of knowledge through the collective intelligence of people. This is an open source encyclopedia of Wikipedia's motto.   Interestingly, Wikipedia started with a challenging motto of "Anyone can Edit Encyclopedia", but the actual number of edits is only 2.5% of logged in users. This means that there are many people who get information from Wikipedia rather than those who edit Wikipedia. In order to overcome this, it seems that the mature attitude of Wikipedia users is necessary.   Wikipedia is a truly innovative site. But there is something to worry about. If you think Wikipedia has incorrect information. It would...
Read more