W11. Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 - Yongil. Seon

1. Summary

We can find Wikipedia's sense of responsibility through reading material. In the case of print media, the issue of copyright is clearly visible. But the problem with online is a little different. Unless you have written your real name, you do not have to point out or question someone's ambiguity. Wikipedia has certainly been at this point. I do not know whether I had created an arbitration committee because I knew there would be a problem, or if I had an arbitration committee when a problem arises. As a result, an important fact is that arbitration committees have been created and they solve ambiguities by doing their jobs.

 

2. Interesting point

However, it is not always encouraging that any group or group is born. Even though the group was born to do good work. Organizations that were born for good purposes may lose their initial purpose over time and may even turn away. For example, it is not possible to exclude the possibility that a person who belongs to the arbitration committee may be in favor of a particular person for his or her own stubbornness or interest.

 

 

3. Discussion

Then we can think. The creation of an organization such as an arbitration committee does not necessarily produce positive results. There is also a possibility that they are willing to pay their profits in the name of a group that produces rather positive results. We believe in the innocence of these organizations and have created such institutions whenever problems arise. This is not just Wikipedia. Is it the right thing in the long run to make organizations that can turn away for their own benefit for the sake of solving problems immediately?