W7. Why Free Culture matters? - DongJoon, Yoo


2012047886 dong-joon, yoo

1. Summary

Wikipedia is freely available licensed content that anyone can edit, use, modify, and distribute. Since all any contributions are freely licensed to the public,no editor owns any article. All contributions can will be mercilessly edited and redistributed. Perhaps the most important element of wikipedia’s free culture is realizing that is collaborative project. Wiki enables efficient collaboration. Even though many people are involved, the work is carried out as if one person is moving. The results are always upgraded to the latest version, and it is easy to restore to the old one. Also, wiki enables open and autonomous collaboration. 

2. Intersting Point

All contribute voluntarily as managers without the need for control or intervention by any particular person. Wiki enables sharing of information and knowledge. Wiki enables organized databases, which are rare to see in an open space. While openness to the Internet has enabled the accumulation of rich and diverse information, the proliferation of unnecessary duplicate content makes it difficult to use practical information. Wikis is a good solution to this.

3. Discussion Point

Free culture benefits everyone, but there can be other problems. The problem is the question of copyright. Copyright like patents in the real world is a major social issue. The concept of copyright was reinforced with the development of the Internet. Copyright laws are strengthened as a result, but many problems still occur. Is free culture the only advantage? If so, what are some other disadvantages besides copyright issues?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more