W7 blog topic: Why Free Culture matters? - JongHoon Park


2012047790 박종훈

Free culture seems to be a topic to reconsider at a time when this fourth industrial revolution and IOT are called keywords.There is so much information on the Web, and so is the reality. Usually, the real information is available in books or type, but it can be in many forms on the Web, such as text, files, videos, and sounds. So the copyright looks more vague on the Web. Many people have not seemed to be sensitive about copyright and don't seem to care much about it, but as of 2018, probably no one knew the importance of copyright. But it is doubtful how effective copyright unconditional protection will work in this era of big data and the fourth industrial revolution.

I think free culture is essential. Because I think I am the beneficiary of that free culture. For instance, I learned muscular exercise on youtube. It's one of my most interesting hobbies these days, and I haven't had much access to information from bodybuilders and bodybuilders familiar with bodybuilding. But now, on a platform called YouTube, many so-called stallengers teach how to exercise and even reveal their menus, supplements, lifestyles, and routines. Although it is a long way to build one's reputation and wealth, what used to be a book can now be accessed anywhere, anytime.

I think free culture is necessary now. In my personal opinion, there are many benefits that could be gained from the sharing of quite a few knowledge or information, other than the copyright artists of music and art. So, what do you think?

Comments

  1. Solène HApril 21, 2018 at 7:55 AM

    I think it is necessary to have free culture now, I agree with you. But, sometimes, copyright is needed to protect the artists work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownApril 22, 2018 at 3:05 AM

    I read your article well. I sometimes saw you watching sports videos. I also think free culture is necessary because i like to watch favorite movies or music. There is a merit in letting someone interesting know what they are doing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownApril 22, 2018 at 7:43 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownApril 22, 2018 at 7:44 AM

    Because the YouTube videos you've used are already the source that the creators posted for sharing purposes, the benefits don't cause any problems. But if you use the video for your private interests, will it not cause any problems then? Will the producers tolerate this? I think the issue of free culture is a part of this.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more