Extra posting : How did Wikipedia tried to improve the number of women editors? / Why do people contribute to Wikipedia?. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

1. How did Wikipedia tried to improve the number of women editors?

  Wikipedia is the most popular online encyclopedia. Many people around the world have achieved unparalleled success through voluntary participation. Ironically, the participation of women in Wikipedia is very low. I think the disposition of the debate in Wikipedia is somewhat controversial. Women than men do not like to fight in discussions. Also, the information that comes up in Wikipedia is rich in male-centered content. On the other hand, there is little information related to the Nobel Prize for women or the rest of the women. This is because it is most likely that the person who edits Wikipedia's information is a white male in the United States.
  In order to improve these women's participation, Wikipedia has made various efforts. First, editor-a-thon is held for the purpose of reinforcing women-related topics and women's editorial participation. In addition, the Wikipedia Tea House project has been launched with the goal of increasing the participation rate of women by providing a friendly environment for new users. Finally, Sisters, an organization that supports technical women, addressed women's editorial involvement and the safety precautions.

2.  Why do people contribute to Wikipedia?

  People share their knowledge without paying money. This is not very easy. Only a few years ago, their own knowledge had to be paid and sold or asked. However, free culture, internet culture and collective intellectual age have changed a lot. People want to share their knowledge with others and create more creative content. In this context, people around the world wanted to share and discuss knowledge in Wikipedia. Because you can hear other people's opinions and know the thoughts of the people in the culture. Instead of receiving money, they learn how to gain knowledge and communicate with others. This is a much bigger gain than working for money.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more