Extra posting : how do we participate in Web 2.0? How do we create the modern-day culture? - Boeun Kim


 
 We participate in web 2.0 in everyday life. Personal Broadcastings, for example, are exposed to many people. Such page as Youtube and podcast is the place where people can respond immediately. Also, people create culture which share interest things to various information through web 2.0.

 Especially, I usually participate in the blog community. If I upload my dog's picture, then community members react. We can chat about dogs, share some tips for caring dogs, and also talk about anything about books or movies. In this area, sometime I found self-healing system and it's mechanism looks interesting. When someone shows discourtesy, or strange streams broke out, community members alert to themselves.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W12. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 6

1. Summary Ideals and reality always conflict. We always dream of a world like utopia, but the real world never becomes utopia. The reason is that there are a lot of variables (personality, culture, social characteristics) that exist in reality. The same is true of a small world called Wikipedia. While Wikipedia has a clear, open, civilized, and equitable encyclopedia as its ideal, this value necessarily results in a dispute when many people are involved. What is needed for this is the 'benevolent dictator'. No matter how open the community, you need someone to control the minimum dispute. They usually speak softly to people, relax the mood through humor, and in the worst case lock out articles or disputes. Since Wikipedia was founded, Larry Sanger and Jimmy Wales are the most influential people. In a nutshell, Sanger was a strong executive, and Wales was a more mild executive. Sanger left Wikipedia, but in fact it does not make sense to say that either of them is better. ...
Read more

W4. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 1-2. - Seron Kim

This article explains the process and motto of Wikipedia. Unlike previous encyclopedias, Wikipedia aims to collect all human knowledge and make it freely editable and redistributable to everyone. In fact, anyone who can access Wikipedia through the Internet can easily edit and get information. Wikipedia is said to be developed through accumulation of knowledge through the collective intelligence of people. This is an open source encyclopedia of Wikipedia's motto.   Interestingly, Wikipedia started with a challenging motto of "Anyone can Edit Encyclopedia", but the actual number of edits is only 2.5% of logged in users. This means that there are many people who get information from Wikipedia rather than those who edit Wikipedia. In order to overcome this, it seems that the mature attitude of Wikipedia users is necessary.   Wikipedia is a truly innovative site. But there is something to worry about. If you think Wikipedia has incorrect information. It would...
Read more

W4. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 1-2. - JiWon Min

  1. Summary    The previous reference books before Wikipedia distanced from institutions, people, and discussions. But Wikipedia is not. It is not just an online multilingual encyclopedia, it is a community and encyclopedia. Wikipedia always plays a role in demonstrating the community's successive conversations. Most importantly, these conversations reveal the collective culture - " good luck ". So, how do we understand this culture?   Wikipedia's culture can be traced to a collaborative culture, which is based on three central policies. " Neutral Point Of View (NPOV.), " " No Original Research, " and " Verifiability. " A neutral perspective may initially seem to be incompatible with neutral knowledge. The two different policies " No Original Research " and " Verifiability. " mean that " all Wikipedia materials must be based on reliable and open-source sources. "  The projects discussed in thi...
Read more