W13 blog topic: Can Wikipedia disappear? - Dong-Joon, Yoo


Dong-Joon, Yoo

It is an epoch-making method by collective intelligence that anyone can freely edit, and there are doubts about the reliability and accuracy of the contents. It is already beyond the level of the existing encyclopaedia, and even if there is a limit to the strict citation standards of academia, it is enough to be able to refer even experts to the contents of reasonable subjects. However, in the case of the Korean version of Wikipedia, there is a large difference. The overall amount is very poor, and the content is not very faithful. There are many reasons why the level of the Korean version of Wikipedia is falling, but I think the biggest reason is that the width of the participants, that is, lack of participation of experts. In particular, for example, legal knowledge is difficult to access easily by ordinary people and it is burdensome to edit the contents by mistake, and if the participation of expert lawyers is small, the content is inferior. 
Currently, I can not imagine a computer without a Wikipedia as a college student. In order to create a report and solve a question, Wikipedia is used as a first rank. Recently I have been using Wikipedia and learning more in detail by talking to other editors. However, despite its many advantages, it also has disadvantages for users. It requires rigorous references due to copyright issues. Even if I write a single line, I must quote publicly acknowledged materials such as news and articles. Although Wikipedia will not disappear in a moment, I wonder how I can tackle the strict copyright problem.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more