W13. Can Wikipedia disappear?


1. Summary

 Wikipedia is the realization of a long-founded vision of the universal encyclopedia. However, the vision is criticized by critics as Utopia or dangerous distopia. The obscenity of the debate is also raised as a problem, which can be understood based on the history of encyclopedic impulse and base passion. Debating may technically be an incentive to a specific purpose, but it may also result in an unwelcome change to others. Therefore, we must continue to develop the means of " critical judgment. "
2. Interesting Point

 For me, having only considered Wikipedia's debate function as a positive aspect, the explanation of the side effects of the discussion was interesting. After reading this sentence, I thought about the function of debate not only in Wikipedia but also in everyday life, and based on my experiences, I realized that it is really hard to judge and pursue discussions as a compelling basis.
3. Discussion

 What position should we take to pursue critical judgments and discussions as compelling grounds? In previous postings, we learned the importance of ' respect ' when using Wikipedia. Perhaps this attitude is a very important factor in realizing the positive function of the debate. What can we do to develop this attitude of respect?

Comments

  1. UnknownJune 2, 2018 at 7:30 AM

    In my opinion, Wikipedia users are so obsessed with their sources that it would be possible to respect them if they were a little tolerant of their sources. And if the deletion of other people's edits is not too strictly applied, it may make you feel more respectful.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownJune 3, 2018 at 3:21 AM

    I think we should be able to understand the meaning of 'respect' in cyberspace. Although the development of technology is economical, there are fewer opportunities to meet people in person. Between humans and machines we must not forget about ethics. Also, consideration is important. I think it is more important for us to think again and express our opinion than to say "NO." to other opinions.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more