W9. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 3-4 Yun-Jin Kim


1. Summary
In chapter 3 is telling about how important collaborative culture is and chapter 4 is talking about open content community.
 People discuss and talk together and make a knowledge and these results are opened to anyone who access Wikipedia. And anyone also edit and collaborate. These two important specifics that Wikipedia has. Especially English Wikipedia.

2. Interesting point and discussion.
I thought a word ‘collaborate’, working together within a community, seem like positive meaning. But in chapter 3, it says collaborate also mean argument and conflict. I was confused first time but second time I agreed what the author said but later I was confused again. Well.. this is interesting, but I think this might be depends on how situation goes on. If conflict left no other special or meaningful thing, this is a ‘Conflict’. But if it left meaningful and thoughtful things, this might be called ‘Collaboration.’ Conflict and Collaborate are has different color. I think the author just saw a one color.

3. Discussion point
The author only talked about Collaborative culture but I would like to say that the people who edit are less than people who just see Wikipedia. Only few of users edit on Wikipedia. This mean that collaboration is not enough than normal society. I want to ask author about ‘Is the collaboration enough that can cover our society?’

Comments

  1. Clément ChevallierMay 6, 2018 at 6:36 AM

    I think your discussion question is interesting. Unfortunately our society in general is really selfish now, that's why many people don't collaborate. We can consider these people as free riders, they use the system without participating. From my point of view, it is not an issue, just a basic reflex of human being.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more