W.11 Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 - HanBin Bae


1.Summury
Trust and collaboration are considered more important than any other ability.These days, it is very busy to live alone in the age of selfishness. Have a lot of personal action But there is a limit to personal solutions. So it is important to cooperate.And just as trust between people is really important, so is trust of each other in the online community. The Wikipedia community has an excellent function in terms of cooperation and trust. Wikipedia has the power to break down and solve many conflicts. It has become a worldwide organization for adaptation and coordination. And an interesting example of community decision-making. An agreement seems to be an appropriate tool for making decisions in a society of equal values and a good culture of faith. Furthermore, this form of decision-making has been at the center of online collaboration since the Internet began.
However, it is not theoretically easy. It would be Wikipedia to solve that.

2.Interesting Point
Man is the smartest creature. Of course there is the ability to solve difficult matters. However, machines are not as good as humans, but they are developing. In many conscious communities, the facilitator does a lot of work. The need for expression and opposition to these statements plays a central role in defining an agreement. The International Internet Technology Council recommends that the head of the Working Group understand the position of the agreement clearly and ask for feedback when he thinks there is an agreement. Wikipedia had a lot of trials. He survived with unique strengths.

3.Discussion
The decision agreed in the debate is final. But the proposed alternatives should also be addressed. Without proper control, no conclusion can be drawn. Here's an amazing thing. There was no mention of how this conclusion could come about and there was a danger to Wikipedia because the decision was not satisfactory. But it remained firm. How did Wikipedia survive this crisis? I think there are many reasons. Share that idea with me.


Comments

  1. UnknownMay 17, 2018 at 5:05 AM

    I read your article well. I also have questions about Wikipedia's final results. Because objectivity is not created by majority rule. A person can not always be right. The majority rule is important, but I think we should not believe it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more