W11. Discuss Reagle’s chapter 5 – Seron Kim

This article explains Wikipedia's consensus. According to this article, it provides a "homonym" link to eliminate ambiguity. And it is said to reduce confusion through suffixes. This is a process to resolve the conflict caused by the title of the article. That is to say, Wikipedia has a vast amount of information. And Wikipedia considers that people will discuss each other, use sources, and document a common consensus. In fact, many people use, edit, and interact with Wikipedia. In order to gather opinions from various people, and to synthesize and agree on them, Wikipedia discusses and finds consensus through voting.
 
But I have never seen a vote in Wikipedia. I think that midnight action and consensus were well done through collective intelligence and discussion. However, this is not a complete consensus in society because it is a consensus of Wikipedia users.
 
Do you think that the limited consensus among these Wikipedia users is correct and objective? It seems to be a problem we think about.

Comments

  1. UnknownMay 20, 2018 at 2:05 AM

    It is perfectly natural that you deny a voting system that you have not experienced. I would not think that even if you, such a system finds a perfect consensus.

    Yongil. Seon

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more

W14. What did I learn in this course?. ByoungHyun Chun(천병헌)

W14. What did I learn in this course? Information sociology 2015048986 천병헌 1. Summary   I took classes in "collective intelligence" and "everyday life sociology". In this process, I had many difficulties. It was very difficult to find information when using Wikipedia. I did not know how to approach. But I learned sandbox while listening to class. Also, it became understandable by learning connection links and sending messages.  Various techniques have helped me edit my Wikipedia. When I edit Wikipedia's information every week, I try to understand Korean culture and culture of other countries. And I tried to find fact-oriented articles and papers. During this process, I was exchanging discussions with many people. I gave feedback on my article and I revised it again. So, I am now able to improve the article writing ability of Wikipedia. Sometimes my friends refer to Wikipedia. Each time my friends see my article and ask. "Did you really make i...
Read more