W10. What would make writing on Wikipedia easier for me? -Geonju Lee

There are two main ways to facilitate endiation in Wikipedia. It is an article selection and editing technique. First of all, choose an article to decide which article I will choose and indivigize. The criteria for determining articles are the editor's personal experience and interests. No matter how important an issue is, if I am not interested or do not know well, I am not interested in editing. Also, without or first knowledge of the background, the power to determine whether the information is true or personal opinion is insufficient even if the source of information is found. This means that the topics associated with the user's experience will feel more comfortable.
Secondly, editing technology is a prerequisite for Wikipedia users. Because it is a text-based encyclopedia based online, it can be difficult to edit unless you are familiar with structure and usage. Users should also become familiar with devices and improve their practical skills, such as how to type text. When editing the original, use programming coding like web design. Visual editing is a complementary method for users who find it difficult to do so. This is a way to correct letters and pictures on the page as I see them, which is much more convenient than putting in difficult code.


  1. Interestingly, Wikipedia teaches these skills directly and holds seminars. It teaches users skills and promotes the spirit of Wikipedia. But the problem is that users don't feel the need to learn and participate. Even if the training of usage and technology makes editing more convenient, education itself would be useless if users were not willing to participate. Is there more ways to increase convenience and participation together?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more