W.10 What would make writing on Wikipedia easier for me? HanBin Bae

Perhaps it is easier to write where you find it interesting and interesting.
Writing requires a basic knowledge of the subject.
You will know less about a topic that you don't care about, and you won't write about it.
But a topic that was really interesting and interested in will be the driving force for writing with confidence.
How can this information be delivered efficiently?It will be easier to write with.
And it is easy to make a page. It can be complicated to create blogs, sns pages, etc. Living in a complex world, people seek simplicity and convenience. People are annoyed at the slightest difficulty.
In contrast, Wikipedia can write as soon as it learns simple things. This simple process is a plus for Wikipedia. In other words, convenience and interesting topics make it easy for me to write in Wikipidaa.

Comments

  1. UnknownMay 10, 2018 at 12:41 AM

    I agree with your idea that people can write more easily about their interesting subjects.
    These days, because society is very complex and there are a lot of social problems, people would find small happiness while they are editing their interests.
    2016062706 MinSeung Sung

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownMay 11, 2018 at 3:56 AM

    kim jong chan
    I read your article well. I also agree with your thoughts. In Wikipedia, you can easily reflect and create your own opinions. I also think that people are more involved because there is no copyright so many people can easily quote and reflect their opinions. I think that these features in Wikipedia are people's participation because it makes the process easier as you say.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more