W7. Why Free Culture matters? - Yeonju Heo

Wikipedia is free culture. When uploading material to Wikipedia, people upload copyright-free files. Anyone can use Wikipedia resources free of charge. And it can be freely distributed.
 
I think free culture very important and necessary, especially in a society where information is money. It is important that copyright is kept. But free culture is also important. If we have to buy all the information and materials with money, who can get them easily? If all cultures are tied to money, culture will no longer become a culture and become a property of a particular class. So, free culture is important. And it does not alienate anyone. Free culture can give equal opportunity to all. Free fonts and free ppt templates are great for students. Free software is useful for those who do not have the money to buy software. Freedom to share creative information leads to a richer culture. Wikipedia is. If people had to pay to see Wikipedia's information, people would not use Wikipedia much. Even if people uploaded the information, there was no user, so it would not be useful.
 
However, But I think it should not ignore copyright. It is because I think that it is true free culture to keep copyright and to share free material freely. I shared my pictures so that everyone could use it on Wikipedia. But I can not blame anyone for not doing so. If we need permission to use, we should get permission.
 
If so, I want to ask. Do free cultures have to open all cultural resources freely? Is copyright a useless concept in free culture?
 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more