W4. Discuss Reagle's Chapters 1-2 -HanBin Bae

1. Summary

It is a story about introducing and comparing Wikipedia, starting with history. Wikipedia has a special vision for access and openness. Wikipedia is based on online wikis and it is easy to edit pages. There is value in the techniques associated with the accessibility of the information required to create a gastric light. And in order to understand Wikipedia, you have to know its history. Along the way, characters such as nupedia .let explain Wikipida.

2. Interesting point

It is said that the information taxonomy that Oatlett described about 100 years ago is now in its most similar form to Wikipedia, and it could be its origin.It is surprising that information has affected the present in this ever-changing society more than 100 years ago. The bottom line is that Optlet's taxonomy is now similar to Wikipedia's taxonomy and credo.
 


3. discussion point
 

The most interesting aspect of Wikipedia is its editing function. Even in the initial best Web browser, major features were not implemented for editing webpages. So why is it that the editing is a great feature of Wikipedia? I think that sharing and sharing of self-verification functions and knowledge is naturally guaranteed. And since there is no hierarchical order between equal layers and central control is impossible, I think it is great that certain items are created in a democratic way based on horizontal relations.

Comments

  1. UnknownMarch 30, 2018 at 11:26 PM

    I think the biggest advantage of Wikipedia is web page editing. Because existing pages were something that a particular administrator could own. But in Wikipedia all are managers and editors. It is a democratic space because it can form a horizontal relationship in which anyone can participate even if it is not professional. But there are some things to be careful about. In this book, the proportion of people who participate in actual editing is a few editors. We must think critically about the editing of these people. It is possible to accept false information and to think biasedly.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? - Seron Kim

Wikipedia is a large site used by people all over the world. People get information through Wikipedia and edit article directly when needed. Through the action of collective intelligence, Wikipedia is becoming more and more developed and growing. Can we trust Wikipedia? I think "We can trust Wikipedia but we should not trust it unconditionally.“   Obviously Wikipedia is reliable. Wikipedia itself has an implicit framework for editing, and people follow it and use it. It is also possible to increase the trust of the article by leaving a source for the information, and to delete the edited information through a predetermined process. So there will be more and more reliable information in Wikipedia.   But you should not trust Wikipedia unconditionally. Because there may be misinformation in Wikipedia. Of course, there is a high possibility that it will be fixed through the deletion function of Wikipedia and the collective intelligence of people. But it will be a ...
Read more

W1. What do I know about Wikipedia and what do I want to learn about it? - Yong il, Seon.

We learned another idea, we want an easy explanation.          Many people used Wikipedia. Why people visited Wikipedia? I have much thought about the answer to this question. Everyone will be editor in Wikipedia. So, several people’s opinions can be confirmed on one issue. It is also an important characteristic of democracy. Democracy is the recognition of the other’s ideas. And already in France, there were ‘Tolerance’. It means that As I am right in my opinion, and so you are right in your opinion. I think Wikipedia is making ‘Tolerance idea’ work very well. So, you can not force your own ideas on Wikipedia. Depending on the situation, users may be students, teachers, or even completely different third parties. From these points of view, Wikipedia is the modern version of Greece’s Agora.            And it is not over. Always people want an easy expanation, the more complex the case. Wikipedia has a structured form...
Read more

W2. My first edits. Describe why you made them. - Seron Kim

I rarely had access to Wikipedia before this class. Because there is a service called 'Knowledge in' operated by Naver in Korea. I've been used to the 'Knowledge in' for a long time, so I've always used it if there's something I don't know. However, I got to know Wikipedia in this class. Wikipedia has a much larger volume of data than I thought, and it is being used by people all over the world. Also, anyone could edit information. I want to search and edit my favorite soccer information. So I decided to do the editing on my idols, Ko Jong-soo and Nadson.   What was interesting about editing was that although the Korean Wikipedia was detailed by the players who played in the Korean league, the English Wikipedia had little or no information. So I want to edit more. Because I want to add their information to English Wikipedia to let people around the world know.   Different countries have Wikipedia sites and the amount and quality of informati...
Read more