W13. Can Wikipedia disappear? - Kim Byung Chan


I think Wikipedia will not disappear. Wikipedia is an Internet encyclopedia that can be used concurrently anywhere in the world. So unless the sudden destruction of the planet or the enormous technology that will replace the Internet is invented, Wikipedia will continue to exist within computers or smartphones. However, Wikipedia has a problem to watch out for not disappear.
 
Wikipedia is an example of collective intelligence. This collective intelligence gathered individual information and became one big dictionary. However, individual information lacks professionality and reference. Lack of professionality and reference makes the information less trustworthy and more likely to be replaced by information from other organizations. While a benevolent dictator of Wikipedia will try to prevent the declining professionality, he is also less trustworthy than other professional groups because of his compassion. I think we have to solve this problem before we can take the Wikipedia user to another organization.
 
Despite these problems, Wikipedia can not disappear. While information is not entirely reliable, Wikipedia's information includes cultural explanations as well as objective explanations. When we understand something, understanding through the cultural background can be more helpful than simply lexical meaning. And as long as culture does not disappear in the world, Wikipedia's information will continue to be updated.
 
As time goes on, I think that the domain of the individual in Wikipedia is becoming more and more wider, which can lead to problems of professionalism and trust. However, since the content of Wikipedia will grow more and more, Wikipedia will not disappear.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more