W13. Can Wikipedia disappear ? - Clément Chevallier

Wikipedia is one of the most famous and visited website in the world. Searching a piece of information on the online encyclopedia is become a reflex for many people. In addition, the community of Wikipedia is huge and loyal. For these reasons, I do not think Wikipedia can disappear overnight.

Nevertheless, some website are created and some others disappear everyday. No websites are immortal. Few years ago, nobody thought that MSN or Myspace could disappear, because there were really popular. However, it happend, because the context changed and new websites appeared, more convenient and trendy. So Wikipedia could disappear in the future because of the competition of other websites. It is the concept of the creative destruction described by the famous economist Schumpeter few years ago.

The disappearance of Wikipedia could also be explained by the lack of donation. Indeed, Wikipedia is totally free and does not use ads to earn money. So its survival depends on the donation of its users. If the amount is not enough to survive anymore, Wikipedia must change its business model and include some ads. Do you think it is a good solution ?

Clément Chevallier.

Comments

  1. UnknownJune 3, 2018 at 10:31 AM

    Is adding advertisements to Wikipedia really a good idea? I am not sure. But even if Wikipedia loses its identity, shouldn't they accept changes if they are at risk of survival?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Solène HJune 3, 2018 at 7:00 PM

    I am not sure that adding ads is a good idea, because Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and it is a real part of its identity. Maybe it is better to talk more about donations, to involve more Wikipedia users.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more