W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet? - Won hyerim

1. Summary
As the controversy over the political neutrality of the Internet grows, it is a question of whether the Internet should be revived and the Internet's comments should be removed. Experts say that the real-name system is a violation of free expression and is a negative condition in that it is a proactive regulation. In order to create a proper online space, site providers also need to come up with measures to improve malicious replies and to gather opinions from users.

2. Interesting point
Talking between people of the same opinion gives them more evidence to support it (persuasion theory), and it is necessary to highlight the reasons for the existence of the group that are different. This could be worse on the anonymous Internet. Such a polarization of public opinion, ignoring the opinions of the few, is ' All I Know. 'It can cause a big misunderstanding. Resolving this requires media education rather than a pre - and post-law legal approach. Don't guess what others are saying, but make sure that I and others are aware that I have different opinions.

3. Discussion
Does the real-name system really mean proactive regulations? Rather, wouldn't a healthy Internet citizen proudly express his or her opinion with his or her real name? Of course, we should develop a sense of citizenship that is based on the ground on which we support our opinions and also on the fact that we listen to other opinions.

http://news.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_serial=1085645&g_menu=020310&rrf=nv

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W3. Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? - Sun bo Sim

 Why do you think people use Wikipedia? Why do others write for it? 1. Summary It is quite natural that the main purpose people use Wikipedia is to get information. So I thought about why people choose Wikipedia for getting information. I think the first reason is the reliability of information in Wikipedia. We have many other sources of getting information. We can search for information scattered on the web through search tools such as Google or Naver. But we do not have the ability to ensure that such data are reliable. However, people prefer Wikipedia because it looks at its slogan " The Free Encyclopedia, " believing it may have the character of an encyclopedia. I also believe that Wikipedia's credibility is enhanced by the fact that its information is constantly being edited through the process of collective intelligence. 2. Interesting Point Most people use Wikipedia to get information. However, some people like to make new articles and give information s...
Read more

W5. Can we trust Wikipedia? Yun-Jin Kim

Then I want to ask. Can we trust News? I think Wikipedia is based on sources. Every time we edit on Wikipedia we need the sources. If we don’t put sources, the information we wrote would be deleted.   So I think asking ‘How can we trust Wikipedia’ is kind of similar to ‘How can we trust News’. I know there could be subjective opinion on Wikipedia. If the topic is unpopular, the public opinion doesn’t focus, there’s could be no feedback and that makes Wiki subjective. for this reason, we have to think before we choose the topic in Wiki. If the topic isn’t famous enough and have no sources, we should think this information isn’t sure enough. but if the topic has clear sources we can have a trust on that information. I think it is not important to ask, ‘is the Wikipedia trustful’. It is important to ask ‘is this information on Wikipedia has a exact source?’.
Read more

W6. How important is it to be civil online on the Internet?-Ji Young An

These days lots of controversial problems are rising. And because of those problems, people fight on the Internet. But I think most of problems happen because of a lack of civic attitudes. As I highlighted the discussion section of Wikipedia last post, talking together with having civic attitudes is very important point. On the Internet lots of people meet. And this means all of them has different thinking and experiences different cultures. So it is certain that everyone's opinion is different. But I think from this difference, the collective intelligence comes. So I think this difference is very important. But sadly, because of this difference some people fight, just arguing their opinion is one hundred percent right. This attitude is nothing good to our collective intelligence. To develop collective intelligence, people need the civic attitudes. Not just persisting stubbornly they should talk and listen, trying to understand other people. If they talk their opinion or thinking...
Read more